Notice: Firmware Links Under Maintenance We are currently undergoing maintenance on all firmware links. If any links are inaccessible, please email or contact Tech Support for the firmware. We appreciate your patience during the maintenance, thank you for your understanding.
Difference between revisions of "News/H.264 Plus vs. H.264"
(→Observation) |
(→Hypothesis) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===Hypothesis=== | ===Hypothesis=== | ||
+ | H.264+ Smart Codec will be more efficient than H.264. I expect a reduction of 20-50% in bandwidth over H.264. | ||
+ | |||
===Experiment=== | ===Experiment=== | ||
===Theory=== | ===Theory=== | ||
===Prediction=== | ===Prediction=== | ||
===Evaluation from Community=== | ===Evaluation from Community=== |
Revision as of 16:47, 29 August 2016
Contents
H.264+ Smart Codec vs H.264
Here are my finding, attached are the graphs and metrics I have taken: Storage (using SD card file size): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:
Still: 60.42% Decreased file size
Movement: 21.10% Decreased file size
Network (using solar winds on SNMP): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:
Still: 40% Decreased stream throughput
Movement (using LPR wheel): 16.84% Decreased stream
Observation
How much bandwidth does Dahua's new H.264+ Smart Codec save compared to H.264? What are the shortcomings, if any, to using H.264+ Smart Codec?
Hypothesis
H.264+ Smart Codec will be more efficient than H.264. I expect a reduction of 20-50% in bandwidth over H.264.