Notice: Firmware Links Under Maintenance We are currently undergoing maintenance on all firmware links. If any links are inaccessible, please email or contact Tech Support for the firmware. We appreciate your patience during the maintenance, thank you for your understanding.

Difference between revisions of "News/H.264 Plus vs. H.264"

(Observation)
(Experiment)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
===Experiment===
 
===Experiment===
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|+Still Image
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|}
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|+Video with Movement
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|}
 +
 
===Theory===
 
===Theory===
 
===Prediction===
 
===Prediction===
 
===Evaluation from Community===
 
===Evaluation from Community===

Revision as of 16:51, 29 August 2016

H.264+ Smart Codec vs H.264

Here are my finding, attached are the graphs and metrics I have taken: Storage (using SD card file size): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:

Still: 60.42% Decreased file size

Movement: 21.10% Decreased file size

Network (using solar winds on SNMP): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:

Still: 40% Decreased stream throughput

Movement (using LPR wheel): 16.84% Decreased stream

Observation

  • How much bandwidth does Dahua's new H.264+ Smart Codec save compared to H.264?
  • What are the shortcomings, if any, to using H.264+ Smart Codec?
  • What equipment is required to take advantage of H.264+ Smart Codec?

Hypothesis

H.264+ Smart Codec will be more efficient than H.264. I expect a reduction of 20-50% in bandwidth over H.264.

Experiment

Still Image
x x
x x
x x
Video with Movement
x x
x x
x x

Theory

Prediction

Evaluation from Community